Improving the Community Response to Sexual Assault: An Empirical Examination of the Effectiveness of Sexual Assault Response Teams (SARTs)

A random sample of N = 172 SART leaders was interviewed. Participants reported on SART structural characteristics and their perceptions of their team’s effectiveness at improving victims’ help-seeking experiences, victims’ participation in the criminal justice system, police processing of cases, and prosecution of cases. Cluster analysis revealed three types of SARTs: “Low Adopters” used fewer formal structures and were less likely to institutionalize collaborative processes into their teamwork; “High Adopters” used more formal structures and were more likely to institutionalize collaborative processes, but did not engage in program evaluation as a multidisciplinary team; and “High Adopters Plus Evaluation” were similar but also engaged in evaluation as a team. High Adopters Plus Evaluation were perceived as significantly more effective than Low Adopters across all domains. High Adopters Plus Evaluation were perceived as more effective at improving victims’ participation in the criminal justice system than High Adopters. SARTs with broader active membership from more stakeholder groups also tended to have higher perceived legal effectiveness. SARTs should consider broad-based active membership and adopting formal structures and collaborative processes to organize their team. Future research can continue to examine factors that contribute to SART success. (Publisher abstract modified)